Logo Countrypages2

Full Country Profile

Bestpracticereportbutton Last Updated: March 2009
Jump to Another Country:
Open-uri20091008-26004-c4shtx-0

Croatia

Score Rank
Financial Standards Index 57.50 out of 100 19
Business Indicator Index 6.40 out of 12 73

Find on this page

Overall Standards Summary

Croatia achieves medium overall compliance with international standards and codes, with a score of 57.5 out of 100 in our Standards Compliance Index. Croatia's compliance in the area of macroeconomic fundamentals is good. One exception is in the area of fiscal transparency were weak enforcement of fiscal laws has been found to compromise fiscal oversight and control. Croatia's banking supervision and payment systems also largely comply with international standards; and the securities and insurance sectors have new laws and a unified supervisor as of 2006. Its corporate governance, securities regulation and insolvency frameworks are satisfactory in terms of legislation, but either lack effective application or have not been sufficiently tested yet. Croatia does not comply fully with the International Financial Reporting Standards. It has agreed to comply with International Auditing Standards and the Financial Action Task Force's 40+9 recommendations on anti-money laundering and the financing of terrorism.

Choose a standard for a detailed compliance report:

Macroeconomic Policy and Data Transparency

CPSpecial Data Dissemination Standard

Croatia has been a subscriber to the Special Data Dissemination Standard (SDDS) of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) since May 20, 1996 and has met subscriber specifications since March 30, 2001. Its metadata are posted on the Dissemination Standards Bulletin Board. According to the SDDS website, Croatia meets SDDS specifications for coverage, periodicity and timeliness of the data and for dissemination of advance release calendars; and the country satisfies the conditions for access, integrity, and quality for most data categories. However, there appears to be the possibility of early government access to certain fiscal, financial, and external sector data because they are presented at the regular meetings of the Council of the CNB, which are often attended by the Finance Minister and the Deputy Prime Minister for the Economy. Additionally, there is no information on the SDDS website regarding confidentiality protections for certain fiscal data, although protections do exist in the provisions of the Law on Statistics and the Law on the Croatian National Bank.

Read More

CPCode of Good Practices on Transparency in Monetary Policy

The International Monetary Fund's 2002 Financial System Stability Assessment judged that the Croatian National Bank (CNB) observes good monetary policy transparency practices. It recommended that the CNB make public its macroeconomic forecast and policy framework, and issue press releases to explain its various policy decisions. In addition, the IMF recommended that the CNB post the schedule of its board meetings on the CNB website and disclose the procedures employed during internal audits. Since that report, the CNB has acted on some of these recommendations, in whole or in part, but has yet to post its meeting schedule or disclose its internal audit procedures. Croatia subscribed to the IMF's Special Data Dissemination Standard in 1996. Croatia plans to accede to the European Union by 2010 and to this end has worked to bring its monetary practices into line with those of the EU.

Read More

ENCode of Good Practices on Transparency in Fiscal Policy

In 2004, the IMF issued a Fiscal Transparency Module to its Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC) for Croatia. According to the report, the country has made significant progress in improving transparency and strengthening fiscal management. There is a clear legislative allocation of responsibilities across the different levels of government and inter-governmental fiscal relations are stable. However, the ROSC found weak enforcement of the laws and regulations on public financial management, resulting in compromised fiscal oversight and control. In addition, quasi-fiscal activities are extensive and occur outside the budget process, and the agencies responsible for fiscal management are poorly coordinated. Thus, fiscal risks are not optimally managed and fiscal accountability is not assured. Croatia has been a subscriber to the IMF's Special Data Dissemination Standard since 1996.

Read More

Institutional and Market Infrastructure

ENEffective Insolvency and Creditor Rights Systems

A survey conducted by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) in 2003 found that Croatia's Bankruptcy Law of 1997 (amended 2000) has a high overall degree of compliance with international standards for insolvency and creditors' rights systems, although several shortcomings were identified. The 2007 EBRD "Commercial Laws of Croatia" publication notes that a number of amendments to Croatia's bankruptcy and insolvency legislation had been passed in 2006, addressing some of the deficiencies previously identified. The changes redefine the tests for insolvency, improve the provisions covering requirements that third parties deliver debtor assets to the insolvency administrator, impose requirements on creditors to file claims within a set period of time, and alter the reimbursement arrangements for administrators so that proceedings need not be cancelled if the debtor runs out of funds to pay for the service. Creditor rights and provisions for the training and professionalization of insolvency administrators are also provided for. However, as far as the practical operation of Croatia's insolvency system is concerned, the 2007 EBRD "Strategy for Croatia" report commented on a large gap between the quality of legislation and the effectiveness of its implementation. According to the 2008 U.S. Department of Commerce report, the World Bank worked with Croatia to address the slowness of its insolvency proceedings, leading to the adoption of a new information and legal system. The Department of Commerce notes that Croatia has harmonized its legal framework with European Union regulations and the principles of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law.

Read More

NCInternational Financial Reporting Standards

In 2007, the World Bank issued a ROSC on accounting and auditing in Croatia, which was a follow up to an earlier ROSC evaluation in 2002. As noted in the 2007 ROSC, Croatia had made considerable progress in developing its regulatory framework for corporate sector financial reporting since the previous assessment. Most importantly, the requirement existing in 2002 that all companies use International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) translated and published in the National Gazette has been limited by the Accounting Law of 2005 only to public interest entities, thus easing the reporting burden for small and medium size enterprises (SMEs). However, it was noted that the IFRSs applicable in Croatia are a 2004 version of the international standards since the translation process had been interrupted between 2000 and 2004. It was thus recommended to establish an ongoing translation and adoption process to ensure compliance with IFRSs. SMEs are now given an option to either apply IFRSs or follow the standards adopted by the Financial Reporting Council (FRC). These standards, according to the Deloitte IAS Plus website, represent a version of international standards in effect in 2000. However, at the time of the World Bank assessment, the FRC was in the process of drafting a separate set of standards suitable for the needs of SMEs based on IFRSs and relevant EU requirements. As far as the recommendations on improving enforcement of accounting requirements, in 2007 the World Bank noted the introduction of important institutional changes. However, it recommended further capacity building to monitor compliance with the accounting requirements. In addition, in line with the 2002 World Bank recommendations, Croatia continued to align its legislation with the EU acqui communitare, although some gaps still exist.

Read More

ENPrinciples of Corporate Governance

Croatian corporate governance has been the subject of multiple World Bank and European Bank of Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) assessments. In its 2004 "Corporate Governance Sector Assessment Project," the EBRD accorded Croatia a rating of "Medium Compliance" with the OECD Principles of Corporate Governance. More recently, the 2008 World Bank ROSC, stated that Croatia had undertaken "substantial legal and regulatory changes" since previous World Bank assessment in 2001 and had improved its corporate governance framework and addressed shortcomings. These changes include introduction of the Acts on Takeovers and the Securities Markets, adoption of a voluntary corporate governance code, amendments to the Companies Act, and the creation in 2006 of a single supervisory agency, HANFA, for capital markets, insurance, and private pensions. However, substantial challenges remain, especially in areas of disclosure and transparency, protection of minority shareholders, and functioning of the board. The 2008 World Bank ROSC recommends that priority be given to a number of reforms, including: revising the company law to address conflicts of interest and to protect small shareholders during delisting; ensuring public availability of annual reports; effectively enforcing disclosure of related party transactions and indirect ownership; encouraging investment funds to become proponents of good governance; and strengthening the institutional capacity of HANFA.

Read More

IDInternational Standards on Auditing

The World Bank ROSC on Accounting and Auditing in Croatia issued in 2007 was a follow up to an earlier ROSC evaluation in 2002. The earlier ROSC advocated for the drafting of a new law on auditing in addition to continuous translation and timely publication of mandated International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) as they are periodically revised by the International Auditing Assurances Board. As explained in the 2007 ROSC, the Auditing Act, which was adopted in line with the World Bank's recommendations in 2005, is broadly aligned with the European Union acquis communautaire and enhances the institutional framework for statutory audit. However, the report points out that as part of Croatia's EU accession the amended Fourth, Seventh and Eighth Company Law Directives still need to be incorporated into national legislation. Although at the time of the 2002 ROSC Croatia had fully translated and adopted all ISAs, the 2007 ROSC report notes that ISAs were subsequently revised, and the translation of the most recent version of ISAs had not yet been completed. However, at the time of the 2007 ROSC the Croatian Chamber of Auditors, which is responsible for the translation, publication, and implementation of auditing standards in Croatia, was in the process of translating the revised ISAs. The 2007 ROSC report also notes that in early July 2007 the IFAC's Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants was translated and adopted. The 2007 ROSC also called for speedier translation and adoption of ISAs until Croatia is granted EU membership, at which time the European Commission will take over responsibility. Obligatory annual audits are required for entities falling within set statutory parameters, while all other companies are audited pursuant to their own rules, i.e., the Memorandum of Incorporation or the Articles of Association.

Read More

IDAnti-Money Laundering/Combating Terrorist Financing Standard

The Financial Action Task Force (FATF), in its 2007-2008 Annual Report names Croatia as one of the jurisdictions that has committed to implementing the FATF's 40+9 recommendations. The Council of Europe's Select Committee of Experts on the Evaluation of Anti-Money Laundering Measures and the Financing of Terrorism (MONEYVAL) conducted a mutual evaluation of Croatia's Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) system against the FATF's forty recommendations and nine special recommendations and published its findings in an April 2008 report, in which, it concluded that Croatia either did not comply or only partially complied with an overwhelming majority of the FATF's recommendations and special recommendations. The assessment found significant shortcomings, citing the numerous layers of legislation involving AML/CFT that result in cumbersome cross referencing in addition to weakness in the legal framework especially with regard to the scope of terrorist legislation. Similarly, regulations concerning customer due diligence and suspicious transaction reporting at financial institutions and Designated non-Financial Business and Professions were found to be wanting. Overall the report was less than positive, although it did indicate that since MONEVAL's last evaluation, in 2002, the country had taken some measures to improve its AML/CFT system. The country has a functioning Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), the Anti-Money Laundering Department (AMLD) within the Ministry of Finance, although the MONEYVAL report notes that the AMLD does not possess any investigative powers instead its main function is to gather information. The AMLD is part of the Egmont group of Financial Intelligence Units.

Read More

CPCore Principles for Systemically Important Payment Systems

Interbank settlements in Croatia are processed through the Croatian Large Value Payment System (CLVPS) and the National Clearing System (NCS) according to the 2008 annual report of the Croatian National Bank (CNB). In 2002, the International Monetary Fund in its Financial System Stability Assessment concluded that the Croatian Large Value Payment System (CLVPS) and the National Clearing System (NCS) - the systemically important payment systems in the country - broadly complied with the Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems' Core Principles. At the same time, the IMF revealed certain shortcomings that, however, posed no systemic risk. Further, the authorities indicated to the assessors that they would try and address some of the shortcomings presented by the IMF through the enactment of the then draft Payment System Law and the Law on the Financial Agency. Both of these laws were subsequently passed. In a 2004 follow-up assessment, the IMF identified the CLVPS as a modern, functional system that follows international best practices, procedures, and technology. The report found that the NCS also complies with international best practices, and noted that the payment systems framework had gone through a major reform process involving the institutional framework, payment structure, and transmission, resulting in the strengthening of the Croatian National Bank's oversight role. The 2008 IMF Financial System Stability Assessment Update confirms that the CLVPS "is a well-functioning real-time gross-settlement payment system operated by the CNB," and notes that "there are no known market infrastructure impediments to interbank trading."

Read More

Financial Regulation and Supervision

CPCore Principles for Effective Banking Supervision

The IMF's Financial System Stability Assessment (FSSA), published in 2002, determined that Croatia either complied or largely complied with most of the Basel Core Principles (BCPs) for Effective Banking Supervision. In August 2004, the IMF conducted an update of its FSSA, and concluded that Croatia had implemented most of the 2002 IMF recommendations through the passage in 2002 of Banking Law No. 07/2002, as well as several additional by-laws. Similarly, in its 2008 FSSA Update, the IMF reiterated that substantial progress had been achieved since the 2002 FSSA in strengthening the regulatory and supervisory framework for banks. Shortcomings remained with regards to transparency in the regulator's operational independence, integration of offsite and on-site supervisory work, and the move toward risk-based supervision. At the time of the 2002 FSSA, the main laws governing banking supervision in Croatia were the Banking Law and the Act on the Croatian National Bank (CNB). Subsequently, however, the legal framework for banking supervision in Croatia was overhauled by the repeal of the Banking Law and the Act on the CNB in 2008. The Banking Law was replaced by the Credit Institutions Act of 2008 and the Act on the CNB was replaced by a 2008 version. The website of the banking regulator - the CNB -discloses that the revised Act on the Croatian National Bank brings the legal framework for the operations of the CNB in line with European Union (EU) standards, in particular with regards to the degree of independence and the objective of the regulator. Despite these changes to the Croatian regulatory framework the overall compliance level for Croatia assigned by the 2002 FSSA and its Updates are maintained since there is no publicly available information suggesting that these changes are detrimental to banking supervision in Croatia. The European Commission's 2006 Progress Report on Croatia's preparation for EU membership indicates that the CNB had made arrangements to implement the EU Capital Requirements Directive by January 2009. The preparations for the implementation of Basel II were on track to become effective in January 2009.

Read More

ENObjectives and Principles of Securities Regulation

The IMF's 2002 FSSA, also indicated that out of the 30 International Organization of Securities Commissions' (IOSCO) Objectives and Principles of Securities Regulation, Croatia implemented 4, partially implemented 25, and did not implement 1 principle. The IMF concluded that there was considerable room for improvement in the securities supervisory framework, particularly with respect to the powers of the former regulator, inspection and surveillance procedures, as well as cooperation between supervisory authorities. The IMF published an FSSA Update in 2008, which stressed that substantial progress had been achieved since the 2002 assessment with regards to the regulation and supervision of the nonbank financial sector. Many weaknesses identified in 2002 had been addressed, and the regulatory and supervisory framework for the securities market was judged to be "largely in line with international standards." The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development's (EBRD) 2005 Securities Markets Legislation Assessment finds Croatian legislation to be in "high compliance" with the IOSCO Principles, as reported in the EBRD's 2007 Commercial Laws Assessment. The EBRD recommends enhancing the effective implementation and enforcement of securities regulation. Pursuant to new legislation in 2006, the Croatian Financial Services Supervisory Agency was established as the unified regulator for the nonbank financial sector, integrating the former Croatian Securities Commission, the Agency for Supervision of Pensions and Insurance, and the Directorate for the Supervision of Insurance companies.

Read More

ENInsurance Core Principles

Also, the IMF's 2002 FSSA, determined that Croatia either observed or broadly observed nine of the 17 Insurance Supervisory Principles (later renamed Insurance Core Principles, or ICPs) promulgated by the International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS). Three principles were partly observed, four were not observed, and one principle was found to be inapplicable. Croatia did not comply with principles related to corporate governance, internal controls, on-site inspection, and reinsurance. Because Croatia made insufficient resources available for supervisory purposes, the principle on the organization of the insurance supervisor was assessed as partly observed. The IMF published an FSSA Update in 2008, which stressed that substantial progress had been achieved since the 2002 assessment with regards to the regulation and supervision of the nonbank financial sector. Many weaknesses identified in 2002 had been addressed, and the regulatory and supervisory framework for insurance was "largely in line with international standards." The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development's 2007 Strategy Report for Croatia also observed that legislation and regulations on the insurance market almost fully meets IAIS standards. However, the Croatian Financial Services Supervisory Agency's lack of adequate enforcement authority and the necessity of introducing risk-based supervision were pointed out by the IMF as the areas requiring further actions.

Read More

Business Indicators

With an overall score of 6.40/12, Croatia is progressing toward standard on the economic, legal, and political indicators that make up our Business Index. Croatia has a market-based mixed economy, in which total government expenditure, including consumption and transfer payments, is very high. Croatia still lags behind most other Eastern and Central Europe transition economies in competition policy, large-scale privatization, enterprise restructuring, and price liberalization, as well as having a more significant role of the state in the economy than in the rest of Europe. Croatia encourages foreign investment and is working to improve its investment climate. Foreign investors receive national treatment by law, but several unofficial barriers exist, such as cronyism and a complex bureaucracy. Significant tax incentives are offered to promote certain types of investment. Private property is protected; however some aspects of land ownership are unclear. Overall, corruption is manageable, as reflected in Croatia's ranking of 62nd out of 180 countries in Transparency International's 2008 Corruption Perception Index.

Read More

Global Indices & Quick Facts

Croatia ranks among in the lower quintiles in the global indices benchmarking political, economic, business, and human capital climates, as shown below. The exceptions are the Bertelsmann Transformation Index and the UNDP Human Development Index. Over the past several years, Croatia has made significant strides toward a democratic polity and a market economy, making it a leading candidate for EU membership. However, as implied by most of the indices, Croatia is still characterized by numerous deficiencies, including residual ethnic discrimination, significant state intervention in economic and civil affairs, and a particularly inefficient judiciary. The financial sector remains a bright spot in the economy, being relatively open, stable, and competitive. Although Croatia is ranked in the 2nd quintile on the Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index, corruption is perceived to be somewhat high, as evidenced by its low score.

Credit Ratings

BBB-/Negative Fitch

Baa3/Stable Moody's

BBB/Negative Standard & Poor's

Macroeconomic Data

2009 GDP (Current Prices): 58.7 billion USD (IMF)

2009 GDP (Per Capita): 13,220 USD (IMF)

2010 GDP (Growth Forecast): 0.4% (IMF)


2009 Inflation (CPI): 2.8% (IMF)

2008 Unemployment: 13.7% (CIA)


2008 Foreign Direct Investment

FDI (Inward): 4.4 billion USD (UNCTAD)

FDI (Outward): 0.20 billion USD (UNCTAD)


2007 Official Development Assistance

ODA (Received): 164 million USD (OECD)

ODA (Disbursed): N/A million USD (OECD)

Countryreportbutton