Logo Countrypages4

Full Country Profile

Bestpracticereportbutton Last Updated: August 2008
Jump to Another Country:
Open-uri20091008-26004-13xen91-0

Ecuador

Score Rank
Financial Standards Index 22.50 out of 100 74
Business Indicator Index 6.16 out of 12 76

Find on this page

Overall Standards Summary

Ecuador achieves low overall compliance with international standards and codes, with a score of 22.5 out of 100 in our Standards Compliance Index. Ecuador's compliance in the area of macroeconomic fundamentals is reasonably high, in large part due to its adoption of the US Dollar as its official currency. Still, progress made in fiscal transparency earlier in this decade does not seem to have been sustained. There is either low compliance or insufficient information regarding its compliance in the market infrastructure and financial supervision categories. Accounting and auditing standards are based on earlier 1999 versions of international standards in this area, which have been updated significantly since. The anti-money laundering framework of Ecuador falls well short of the Financial Action Task Force's (FATF) 40 plus 9 recommendations. A lack of publicly available information makes an assessment of Ecuador's compliance with financial supervision standards difficult. It is noteworthy in this context that a 2004 Financial Sector Assessment Program conducted by the International Monetary Fund has not been published to date. On a positive note, in late 2005, Ecuador became the first country in the Andean region to adopt the Andean Corporate Governance Code as the national standard, with several projects ongoing to facilitate its implementation.

Choose a standard for a detailed compliance report:

Macroeconomic Policy and Data Transparency

CPSpecial Data Dissemination Standard

According to information on the Special Data Dissemination Standard (SDDS) website of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Ecuador has been an SDDS subscriber since March of 1998 and presently meets all requirements for coverage, periodicity, and timeliness. Ecuador does invoke the timeliness flexibility option for unemployment and wage/earnings data, however. Advance release calendars are produced for all required categories, although the calendar flexibility option is applied to national accounts data. The 2003 IMF Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC), data module found that Ecuador's macroeconomic statistics were of good quality overall, but found shortcomings in detail and in the quality of some source data, particularly in the area of government finance statistics. The SDDS website discloses that the current practice of announcing methodological changes at the time of implementation may change, as there are plans to switch to advance notice for several datasets. While applauding the good informal cooperative relationship existing among the principle statistics agencies (Central Bank, Ministry of Economy and Finance, and the National Institute of Statistics and Censuses), the ROSC recommended that this relationship be formalized. It also called for modernization of the Statistics Law and a greater official emphasis on the importance of national statistical policy.

Read More

FCCode of Good Practices on Transparency in Monetary Policy

Following the economic crises of the late 1990s, during which Ecuador suffered a series of bank failures and faced the prospect of hyperinflation, the Central Bank of Ecuador (BCE) officially adopted the U.S. dollar as the official Ecuadorian currency. As a result, the CBE effectively relinquished its traditional role in the formulation and application of monetary policy to the Federal Reserve of the United States, although it retained certain other central bank functions, such as statistical compilation and reporting, maintaining banking system liquidity, and serving as the depository for public funds. However, under the dollarization scheme, the key aspects of the IMF's Code of Good Practices on Monetary Policy are implemented by the U.S. Federal Reserve. As long as the dollarization appears credible, Ecuador is therefore assigned the level of compliance of the United States for the monetary policy standard.

Read More

IICode of Good Practices on Transparency in Fiscal Policy

According to the IMF, reporting on its 2005 Article IV Consultations with Ecuador, legislation passed early in this decade has led to improvements in the transparency of fiscal policy. The laws, passed in 2002, are the Fiscal Transparency, Stability, and Responsibility Law and the Organic Control Law, both of which are supplemented by accompanying regulatory changes. Also contributing to improved transparency has been the reactivation of the World Bank-financed integrated information system known by the acronym SIGEF. In 2005, however, the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank issued a Country Financial Accountability Assessment (CFAA) that spoke of a "culture of secrecy" that continues to plague Ecuador's handling of the national budget and disclosure of public expenditure. Weak Congressional oversight has led to the public perception that the Ecuadorian government's commitment to transparency is poor and that there is insufficient government accountability for its spending policies. The 2007 IMF's Executive Board's Article IV discussions noted positive developments and encouraged the adoption of a formal medium-term fiscal framework. While Ecuadorian authorities are tackling some issues related to fiscal transparency, the information publicly available is not sufficient to rate Ecuador's compliance with the IMF's Code of Fiscal Transparency. A formal assessment conducted by the IMF in 2004 has not been published as of June 2008.

Read More

Institutional and Market Infrastructure

IIEffective Insolvency and Creditor Rights Systems

There is paucity of information available to the public that addresses the extent of Ecuador's compliance with the Principles and Guidelines for Effective Insolvency and Creditor Rights Systems developed by the World Bank. A 2004 report by the IMF recommended that Ecuador enact reform legislation that would strengthen its insolvency and creditor rights regime, but as of the publication of the IMF's 2005 Article IV Consultations report for Ecuador, no such legal reform had yet been enacted. A 2004 World Bank report authored by Johnson and Alonso called the existing legislation "obsolete" and "highly inefficient," and noted that there was little public confidence in the insolvency regime. The authors added that the existing institutional structure is inadequately staffed and trained in the intricacies of insolvency work. The 2005 Article IV Consultations report did note that a draft bankruptcy and creditors' rights bill was expected to be presented to Congress in 2006. Later that year a new Law on Reorganization Proceedings was passed; however it is unclear whether this is a final version of the draft law cited in the 2005 IMF report.

Read More

NCInternational Financial Reporting Standards

According to a 2004 World Bank assessment of Ecuadorian accounting and auditing practices, domestic companies follow the Ecuadorian Accounting Standards (NECs), which are based on the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as they existed in 1999-2000. IFRSs have been revised since then and, consequently, the Ecuadorian standards fail to provide guidance in a number of sensitive accounting areas, thus undermining the quality of the available financial information. Banks and insurance companies follow accounting requirements set by the Superintendency of Banks and Insurance (SBS). These requirements, according to the World Bank, differ from IFRSs. It was therefore recommended that all public interest entities adopt and require mandatory application of IFRSs, and that the accounting principles for financial institutions and insurance companies be harmonized with the rest of the corporate sector. Furthermore, the World Bank suggested providing simplified accounting standards for small and medium sized enterprises. As far as the enforcement of accounting and auditing standards is concerned, the World Bank observed that both the Superintendency of Companies and the SBS, each of which is tasked with ensuring compliance with the financial reporting requirements, need to improve their practices in this regard.

Read More

ENPrinciples of Corporate Governance

Ecuador is increasingly recognizing the significance of corporate governance practices, according to a 2006 Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) donors' memorandum. However, a significant portion of Ecuador's corporate sector is made up of family enterprises, which seem reluctant to change. Nonetheless, in 2005, Ecuador became the first country in the Andean region to adopt the Andean Corporate Governance Code (CAGC) as national standard. The CAGC constitutes a framework and compilation of policies, standards, systems, and guidelines based upon the 2004 Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development's (OECD) principles and the 2003 Latin American White Paper on Corporate Governance. It includes a set of systematically arranged basic rules, with 51 specific measures that define internationally accepted standards of corporate governance. Part of an ongoing IDB-funded project is to disseminate the code and train professionals in understanding and implementing the CAGC. Overall, Ecuadorian capital markets remain underdeveloped, and trading on the stock exchanges of Quito and Guayaquil primarily consists of fixed-income government bonds.

Read More

NCInternational Standards on Auditing

A 2004 World Bank assessment of Ecuadorian accounting and auditing practices finds that Ecuadorian Auditing Standards (NEAs) are based on the International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) promulgated by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) as they existed in 1999, when Ecuador adopted ISAs. Since 1999, however, the IAASB revised many of the standards and also issued new ISAs, and these changes have not been adopted in Ecuador due to the lack of established due process for updating the national standards. The World Bank, therefore, recommended full adoption of ISAs for public interest entities in Ecuador. Given the fact that auditors of financial institutions and insurance companies are already required to apply ISAs in statutory audits, the World Bank specifically called for the adoption of the international standards for audits of listed companies and entities regulated by the Superintendency of Companies. The World Bank found that the enforcement of existing financial reporting requirements was inadequate and noted that the most important factors hindering effectiveness of the audit process are the lack of implementation guidance, quality control, and audit committees.

Read More

NCAnti-Money Laundering/Combating Terrorist Financing Standard

In 2007, the Financial Action Task Force for South America (GAFISUD) published a mutual evaluation on Ecuador's compliance with the Financial Action Task Force's (FATF) 40 plus 9 recommendations. The report concluded that Ecuador is noncompliant with 28 of the recommendations, including all nine special recommendations on terrorist financing. Ecuador has no law criminalizing the financing of terrorism, and with respect to the FATF recommendation on the criminalization of money laundering, Ecuador earns only a partially compliant rating. The mutual evaluation identifies shortcomings in the Ecuadorian anti-money laundering framework, one of which is the lack of clarity regarding what constitutes money laundering offenses. Another is the inefficiency of the sanctioning process. At the time of the mutual evaluation, the Ecuadorian financial intelligence unit (UIF) had not yet become operational. However, a 2008 U.S. Department of State (DoS) report notes that the UIF became operational on December 1, 2007. Ecuador is a party to the 1988 UN Drug Convention, the UN International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism, the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, and the UN Convention against Corruption.

Read More

IICore Principles for Systemically Important Payment Systems

The Ecuadorian National Payments System (SNP) comprises mainly three systems, the Interbank Payment System (SPI); the On- line Payment System (SPL); and the Check Clearing System (SCC). The SPI is a low-value interbank retail payment system with a deferred net settlement. The SPL is a large-value real-time gross settlement system which processes transfers electronically and settles payments in real-time. The SCC, as the name suggests, clears checks. The creation of a reformed and modernized national payment system was made imperative by the dollarization of the Ecuadorian currency in 2000, notes a 2004 report jointly published by the Center for Latin American Monetary Studies and the World Bank. The reform process initiated in 2000 aimed at increasing the efficiency and security of payment mechanisms, reducing costs and time involved, integrating all the payment systems at the national level and standardizing their procedures, and introducing new payment instruments and financial mechanisms, thereby achieving compliance with international standards. However, none of the systems mentioned above have been clearly designated as systemically important by the country's central bank, which is responsible for administering, regulating, and overseeing the SNP. There is also scant recent information publicly available that directly addresses Ecuador's compliance with the Core Principles for Systemically Important Payment Systems promulgated by the Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems.

Read More

Financial Regulation and Supervision

IICore Principles for Effective Banking Supervision

A 2004 Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP) conducted by the IMF for Ecuador, included an assessment of the country's banking supervisory framework. As of June 2008, the results of the FSAP have not been published. However, a 2005 IMF Article IV report notes that the FSAP found a relatively resilient financial system, albeit with some vulnerabilities pertaining to the regulatory framework and supervision. To address some of the FSAP recommendations, the Ecuadorian authorities developed a detailed work plan that included enacting a bankruptcy and creditor rights bill in the beginning of 2006; tightening the definition of liquidity and capital; and developing better risk management practices. Ecuadorian authorities claimed that other recommendations could not be met due to legal obstacles and political difficulties. The 2005 IMF report, therefore, asked Ecuador to strengthen efforts to implement all the FSAP recommendations. A 2004 World Bank report provides details on a Financial Sector Technical Assistance Loan (FSTAL) to Ecuador to strengthen (among other things) the country's supervisory and regulatory framework for the banking sector. However, the report notes that the loan program was not successful in achieving all its objectives, especially in terms of modernizing the legal framework for the financial sector. In 2006, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) disbursed a technical assistance loan to the Superintendency of Banks and Insurance to improve financial intermediation in Ecuador, establish effective prudential norms and streamline supervision. The USAID website notes that the technical assistance mission is helping the Ecuadorian authorities implement a strategic plan to modernize banking standards in compliance with the Basel Core Principle (BCPs) for Effective Banking Supervision. Despite this information, none of the publicly available sources explicitly address Ecuador's compliance with the BCPs.

Read More

IIObjectives and Principles of Securities Regulation

Ecuadorian capital markets remain underdeveloped, with only two small stock exchanges: in Quito and in Guayaquil. The enactment of the 1993 Securities Market Law (which was reformed in 1998) set up a modern regulatory structure, opened stock market trading to banks and other firms, and encouraged the development of mutual funds. It also led the way in the recovery of the financial system from the worst of the economic crisis of 1999-2000. However, judging from the information available, the capital markets are still weak, with significant hurdles in the way of stability and efficiency. The National Securities Council (CNV) is the regulatory body of the capital markets while the Superintendency of Companies is the supervisory authority that authorizes securities firms and supervises their activities while executing the rules and policies issued by the CNV. Overall, there is insufficient information publicly available to make an assessment of Ecuador's compliance with the Objectives and Principles of Securities Regulation of the International Organization of Securities Commissions.

Read More

IIInsurance Core Principles

As of May 2008, there is paucity of information in the public domain as to Ecuador's compliance with the Insurance Core Principles promulgated by the International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) in 2003. Under the 1994 General Law on the Institutions of the Financial System and the 1965 General Law on Insurance, the Superintendency of Banks and Insurance (SBS) supervises insurance and reinsurance companies in Ecuador. In 2001, the World Bank, IMF, Inter-American Development Bank, and the Andean Development Corporation disbursed to Ecuador the Financial Sector Technical Assistance (FSTAL) Loan. The objective of the loan was to assist Ecuador in overcoming the consequences of the financial crisis and to strengthen the supervisory authority and capacity of the financial sector's regulators, including those of the SBS. However, as the 2004 World Bank report points out, the overall result of the project's implementation were found to be "unsatisfactory." The FSTAL did not achieve its objective of modernizing the legal framework for the financial sector and its aim of unifying the General Law on the Institutions of the Financial System (which had been amended in a patchwork fashion to cope with the financial crisis).

Read More

Business Indicators

With an overall score of 6.16/12, Ecuador is progressing toward standard on the economic, legal, and political indicators that make up our Business Index. Ecuador is a market-based economy. However, production in the state-run oil sector is falling due to corruption and poor management. While Ecuador is formally open to foreign investment as the law accords foreign and domestic firms equal treatment, lax contract enforcement, bribery, and onerous labor laws present obstacles to foreign and domestic investors alike. In addition, courts often neglect to uphold property rights, and the government fails to enforce intellectual property rights. Political instability, a serious impediment to business in Ecuador, is apparent in the fact that Ecuador has had seven presidents since 1996, more if presidents serving less than a day are included. Since independence, Ecuador has had 19 constitutions, and its current National Constitutional Assembly, which convened on November 29, 2007, is working on a draft of the 20th Constitution at the behest of Ecuadorian President Correa. Corruption is very extensive, reflected in Ecuador's ranking of 150th out of 180 countries in Transparency International's 2007 Corruption Perceptions Index.

Read More

Global Indices & Quick Facts

Ecuador is ranked from the 3rd to the 5th quintile in the global indices benchmarking its political, economic, business, and human capital climates, as shown below. Ecuador's political system has been functioning in cycles of crisis for more than a decade. This, and the recurrent removals of elected presidents, contributes to its “Partly Free” rating in the Freedom House Index. Despite its rich natural resources, Ecuador’s inefficient government bureaucracy, cumbersome business regulations, and the absence of an impartial judiciary all prevent successful development and weigh heavily on the country's scores in the indices measuring economic and business freedom. Access to capital, or in Ecuador’s case the mere presence of a functioning banking system, remains problematic despite the adoption of the dollar after the financial crisis in the late 1990s. Corruption is perceived to be very high, as evidenced by Ecuador's ranking in the Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index.

Name Year Rank Score Quintile
Bertelsmann Transformation Status Index 2010 68/128 5.56/10 3
Heritage Foundation Economic Freedom Index 2010 147/179 49.3% 5
Economic Freedom of the World Index 2009 120/141 5.83/10 5
World Economic Forum Global Competitiveness Index 2009 105/133 3.56/7 4
Milken Institute Capital Access Index 2009 82/122 3.59/10 4
World Bank Ease of Doing Business Index 2009 138/183 N/A 4
UNDP Human Development Index 2009 80/177 0.81/1 3
Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index 2009 146/180 2.2/12 5
Freedom House Index 2009 Partly Free 3/7

Credit Ratings

CCC/Stable Fitch

Caa3/Stable Moody's

CCC+/Stable Standard & Poor's

Macroeconomic Data

2009 GDP (Current Prices): 50.2 billion USD (IMF)

2009 GDP (Per Capita): 3,559 USD (IMF)

2010 GDP (Growth Forecast): 1.5% (IMF)


2009 Inflation (CPI): 5% (IMF)

2008 Unemployment: 8.7% (CIA)


2008 Foreign Direct Investment

FDI (Inward): 1.0 billion USD (UNCTAD)

FDI (Outward): 0.00 billion USD (UNCTAD)


2007 Official Development Assistance

ODA (Received): 215 million USD (OECD)

ODA (Disbursed): N/A million USD (OECD)

Countryreportbutton