Logo Countrypages1

Full Country Profile

Bestpracticereportbutton Last Updated: August 2009
Jump to Another Country:
Elsavador

El Salvador

Score Rank
Financial Standards Index 33.33 out of 100 64
Business Indicator Index 10.65 out of 12 26

Find on this page

Overall Standards Summary

El Salvador achieves low overall compliance with international standards and codes, with a score of 33.33 out of 100 in our Standards Compliance Index. A lack of publicly available information prevents an assessment of El Salvador’s compliance with standards in insolvency, banking and insurance supervision. However, the government of El Salvador is seeking congressional approval of the Financial Sector Supervision and Regulation Law, which was expected to be passed by May 15, 2009, to strengthen financial sector supervision in El Salvador. Corporate governance and auditing standards are known to be lagging behind international best practice. Adoption of the dollar as the official currency and subscription to the International Monetary Fund's Special Data Dissemination Standard earn El Salvador high marks in the macroeconomic policy transparency category. Some short-and medium term improvements could lead to an even higher level of compliance for fiscal transparency practices. In the area of anti-money laundering, the government of El Salvador has to come through on its commitment to implement the Financial Action Task Force's 40+9 recommendations.

Choose a standard for a detailed compliance report:

Macroeconomic Policy and Data Transparency

FCSpecial Data Dissemination Standard

El Salvador subscribed to the International Monetary Fund’s (IMF) Special Data Dissemination Standard (SDDS) in June 1998. According to the IMF’s 2004 Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC) – Data Module, El Salvador fully complies with best practice standards on statistical compilation and dissemination. Based on information provided on the IMF’s SDDS website and a 2009 Observance Report by the IMF, El Salvador remains in compliance with all criteria of the Code. Despite these observations, the ROSC suggests that El Salvador make improvements to its compilation of statistics, namely by passing a new national statistics law and providing the national statistics agency with more resources.

Read More

FCCode of Good Practices on Transparency in Monetary Policy

Following steady economic growth and lower inflation during the 1990s as it rebuilt from a 12-year civil war, El Salvador adopted the dollar as its official currency in 2001. As a result, the Central Reserve Bank of El Salvador effectively relinquished its traditional role in the formulation and application of monetary policy to the United States Federal Reserve, although it retained certain other central bank functions, such as financial system regulation and statistical compilation and reporting. Under the dollarization scheme, the key aspects of the International Monetary Fund's Code of Good Practices on Monetary Policy are implemented by the United States Federal Reserve. As long as the dollarization appears credible, El Salvador is therefore assigned the level of compliance of the United States for the monetary policy standard. While no formal third-party assessment on the transparency of U.S. monetary policy and the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) of the Federal Reserve ("the Fed") has been published, the U.S. Treasury and the Fed conducted a self-assessment in 1999, comparing Fed practice against the Code of Good Transparency Practices for Monetary Policy issued by the IMF. The self-assessment found the U.S. to be in full compliance with the IMF's code. This finding is supported by various IMF reports which have characterized the Fed's monetary policy as "highly transparent" and point out that improvements have been made over recent years, such as increased transparency of FOMC members’ views and faster publishing of minutes from FOMC meetings. Overall, the IMF found that the Fed's communications strategy "has been highly effective."

Read More

ENCode of Good Practices on Transparency in Fiscal Policy

According to a 2005 IMF Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC) – Fiscal Transparency Module, El Salvador complies with many of the norms of the Code of Good Practices on Fiscal Transparency. Significant progress has been made in the form of improved accounting practices, reduction of quasi-fiscal activities, and clearer relationships between the central government and non-financial public companies. Much of this advancement was achieved during extensive privatization of government entities in the late 1990s. The IMF believes El Salvador could come closer to full compliance through a variety of short-term and medium-term improvements, including making its budgetary planning more long-term, clarifying the relationship between the central and local governments, and mandating the publishing of budgetary reports.

Read More

Institutional and Market Infrastructure

IIEffective Insolvency and Creditor Rights Systems

A 2009 U.S. Country Commercial Guide for El Salvador reports that the legal framework for insolvency in the country is comprised of the Commercial Code, Code of Mercantile Processes, and the Banking Act. The country does not use a separate bankruptcy code or specialized courts for bankruptcy proceedings. The policy objective under Salvadoran bankruptcy law is the payment of creditors, rather than favoring restructuring and consequently protection of the company. Thus, the company continues in operation only if that decision is in line with the creditors' interests or else it is forced into liquidation. Furthermore, according to the Americas Restructuring and Insolvency Guide 2008/2009, protections given to secured creditors and the judicial proclivity towards receivership leaves creditors with little reason to resort to bankruptcy. As a result, the report points out that despite having a basic legal framework for bankruptcy in El Salvador, there have only been two corporate bankruptcy proceedings conducted in the last twenty years. Beyond this observations, however, there is insufficient information publicly available as to El Salvador's compliance with the Principles and Guidelines for Effective Insolvency and Creditor Rights Systems developed by the World Bank.

Read More

IDInternational Financial Reporting Standards

A 2005 World Bank review of the accounting and auditing environment in El Salvador notes that since 2000, El Salvador has been gradually moving towards adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs). In December 2000, the Accounting and Auditing Oversight Board (CVCA) issued a resolution requiring all companies to apply international accounting standards starting January1, 2002. However, this deadline has been moved several times. Moreover, the CVCA adopted the 2003 version of IFRSs, and, according to a paper by Shah, H. et al., as of 2007 the most recent version of IFRSs still had not been adopted. In December 2004, the CVCA issued a resolution exempting banks and insurance companies from applying IFRSs. Although the World Bank commended El Salvador for the efforts to bring financial reporting framework in line with the international best practices, it pointed out to the slow pace of adoption which resulted from the deficiencies in the regulatory framework and lack of capacity in the audit profession and business community. Based on the conclusions and recommendations of the World Bank assessment, in April 2008 the FIRST Initiative approved a project aimed at improving the quality of financial reporting in El Salvador, with the expected completion date of June 2009. Among the main outputs of the project, are the implementation of the ROSC’s recommendations, development of a detailed and formal transition plan to the adoption of the most recent version of IFRSs, analysis of the existing legislative framework for financial reporting, and assisting the CVCA and the Superintendency of Corporate Obligations in strengthening their enforcement mechanisms.

Read More

NCPrinciples of Corporate Governance

A 2005 Booz Allen Hamilton report and a 2007 IMF working paper by Shah et al. find corporate governance relatively weak in El Salvador, mainly due to lack of transparency, insufficient minority shareholder protection, lack of public awareness of corporate governance, as well as a dedicated corporate governance code, and ineffective legal enforcement. The Commercial Code provides the main framework for corporate governance in the country, while the Law on the Securities Market of 1994 is considered outdated. Various recommendations are made by both reports. Shal et al. recommends that a code of corporate governance be developed, disclosure requirements be strengthened, the securities law be updated, and full implementation of the IFRSs be required. The 2005 Booz Allen Hamilton report suggests incorporating the protection of minority shareholders and corporate governance principles into the Commercial Code in line with international best practices. Training programs for business people, lawyers, judges and government officials are also recommended, as well as promotional campaigns for the public to increase awareness of corporate governance. Moreover, the report highlights the need to pass regulations to better discipline and supervise the legal profession.

Read More

NCInternational Standards on Auditing

The 2005 World Bank review of the accounting and auditing environment in El Salvador reports that in 2000, International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) were incorporated into the country’s legal framework. However, since the World Bank assessment, the International Auditing and Assurances Board has revised some of the ISAs and there is no indication that those changes have been adopted by the CVCA. Under Salvadoran law all joint stock companies and limited liability companies are mandated to prepare audited annual financial statements. This requirement, according to the World Bank, places excessive reporting burden on Small and Medium-size Enterprises, which should not be required to have their financial statements audited. It was also indicated that listed companies, banks, insurance companies, and pension funds are subject to additional reporting regulations prescribed by the three respective supervisory Superintendencies. As far as the enforcement of auditing standards is concerned, the World Bank cautioned that the CVCA does not monitor compliance with ISAs, although it stated its intent to introduce periodic quality control. The three Superintendencies, on the other hand, enforce auditing rules to a varying degree. The World Bank pointed out that the CVCA adopted a Code of Ethics for Public Accountants in May 2005, based on the 1998 version of the International Federation of Accountants’ (IFAC) Code of Ethics. The IFAC Code was subsequently amended, and the World Bank recommended that the CVCA adopt those revisions. El Salvador is not a member of the IFAC.

Read More

IDAnti-Money Laundering/Combating Terrorist Financing Standard

El Salvador has one of the largest banking systems in Central America; its banks maintain important financial contacts with those of neighboring countries - Mexico, the Caribbean, and the United States. A 2009 report by the U.S. Department of State (DoS) suggests that the growth of El Salvador's financial sector and the increase in narcotics trafficking in the region continue to make it vulnerable to money laundering. The report pointed out that, in 1998, El Salvador enacted an anti-money laundering (AML) law which criminalized money laundering. In 2006, the Government of El Salvador passed counterterrorism legislation which, according to the DoS report, defines acts of terrorism and imposes penalties for committing such acts. However, the DoS concludes that the government of El Salvador has not taken any significant steps during 2008 "to improve its ability to detect, investigate, and prosecute money laundering and financial crimes." In addition, its financial intelligence unit (FIU) lacks institutional investigative capacity, and is not utilized sufficiently. On June 5, 2009, El Salvador was suspended as a member of the Egmont Group of FIUs. Despite the lack of a detailed assessment on El Salvador's AML/combating the financing of terrorism regime against the Financial Action Task Force's (FATF) requirements, the country is named as one of the jurisdictions that have undertaken to implement the FATF's 40+9 recommendations, according to the organization's 2007-2008 annual report.

Read More

IDCore Principles for Systemically Important Payment Systems

Based on the results of the World Bank’s 2008 Global Payment Systems Survey, Cirasino and Garcia’s 2008 report evaluates a country's compliance with four distinct sub components which are broadly based on the Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems' (CPSS) Core Principles for Systemically Important Payment Systems. The component, "large value payment systems" addresses aspects of Core Principles (CP) III through CP X and the 2008 report by Cirasino and Garcia concludes that El Salvador achieves a "low level of development” for this component. El Salvador achieves “medium-high level of development” for the legal and regulatory framework component, which covers CP I and to some extent CP II. Finally the third component of interest in the Cirasino and Garcia report is the payment system oversight component for which El Salvador achieves a “low level of development.” The report also indicates that no real-time gross settlement (RTGS) system is available in El Salvador, and a check clearing system is the only existing large-value payment system in the country. A RTGS system for large-value inter-bank settlement is envisioned as part of the Central Bank of El Salvador’s (BCR) strategy to modernize payment systems, and is expected to begin operation in 2009, according to the BCR’s 2008 Annual Report. The system is supposed to be in line with international standards promoted by the Bank for International Settlements, the World Bank and the IMF. The Banking Act, the Organic Law on the BCR, the Commercial Code, and BCR regulations provide the main legal framework for payment systems in El Salvador. Cash is the primary payment instrument in El Salvador, and check is the major non-cash payment instrument. ATMs, debit and credit cards are also available to bank customers, and have grown more accessible in recent years.

Read More

Financial Regulation and Supervision

IICore Principles for Effective Banking Supervision

The IMF's 2008 Article IV Consultation report highlights that the banking sector in El Salvador is among the largest in Central America, and is mainly foreign-owned, with approximately 95 percent of bank assets under foreign ownership. While the dominance of large international banks might help deepen financial intermediation, and improve risk management and corporate governance practices in El Salvador, it complicates domestic supervision. The Superintendency of the Financial System (SFF) is the supervisory and regulatory authority for banks, cooperative banks, and insurance companies in El Salvador. According to a 2008 article by Zygmunt Brett, published in the International Financial Law Review, the Banking Act of 1999 has improved the protection of depositors through stricter capital and risk management requirements. The Law has also enhanced compliance with Basel standards, and has given broader authority to the SFF in terms of banking supervision. The IMF's 2008 Article IV Consultation report commends the Salvadoran authorities for their internal restructuring of the SFF with the aim of moving towards risk-based supervision. As reported in its 2009 Letter of Intent, the Government of El Salvador seeks congressional approval of the Financial Sector Supervision and Regulation Law, which was expected to be passed by May 15, 2009, to strengthen financial sector supervision in El Salvador. The Law would merge the supervisory authorities for banks, pension funds, and the stock market; enhance the autonomy of the newly-merged institution; and provide legal protection for supervisors. Furthermore, cross-border consolidated supervision would be strengthened. Although the new Law is aimed at improving the overall supervisory structure, none of the publicly available sources directly and comprehensively addresses El Salvador's compliance with the Basel Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision.

Read More

IDObjectives and Principles of Securities Regulation

A self-assessment by El Salvador on its implementation of the International Organization of Securities Commissions' Objectives and Principles of Securities Regulation, concludes that supervision and enforcement in the Salvadoran securities market have been weak, as reported in a 2007 paper by Shah et al. for the IMF. The authors explain that the powers of the securities regulator, the Superintendency of Securities (SV), are hindered by deficiencies in the Law on the Securities Market of 1994. In particular, major weaknesses remain with regards to the SV's lack of regulatory and supervisory powers over the El Salvador Stock Exchange; inadequate protection of minority shareholders' rights; a weak framework for the regulation of market intermediaries; and an inadequate sanctioning system. In addition, mutual funds are not authorized to operate under the Law on the Securities Market. The 2007 paper by Shah et al. recommends revising the securities market law to clarify the role of the SV as the main regulator of the securities market. The composition of the board of the SV should also be reviewed to strengthen its operational independence. With regards to the supervision of collective investment schemes, the authors recommend expediting the passage of the new mutual fund law, which has been under consideration by Congress for several years. According to the Government of El Salvador's 2009 Letter of Intent to the IMF, the passage of the Financial Sector Supervision and Regulation Law is expected to strengthen the overall financial sector supervision.

Read More

IIInsurance Core Principles

The SFF supervises inter alia the insurance sector. According to the U.S. Department of Commerce's 2009 Country Commercial Guide, the Insurance Companies Law of 1996 regulates the operation of domestic and foreign insurance firms. The IMF's 2008 Article IV Consultation report commends the Salvadoran authorities for their internal restructuring of the SFF with the aim of moving towards risk-based supervision. Although the SFF is a member of the International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS), there is insufficient information publicly available as to El Salvador's compliance with the Insurance Core Principles issued by the IAIS.

Read More

Business Indicators

With an overall score or 10.65 out of 12, El Salvador is at standard on the economic, legal, and political indicators that make up our Business Index. El Salvador is a market-based economy that has made impressive strides in building a competitive business environment since the 12-year long civil war ended in 1992. Foreign and local investors are treated equally before the law, and the free trade agreement among Central American countries, the Dominican Republic, and the United States (CAFTA-DR) includes provisions to strengthen investment dispute resolution in El Salvador. Still, the inefficient and inconsistent enforcement of commercial law is a drawback in the overall encouraging investment environment. Corruption remains a problem in El Salvador, although various institutions such as the Anticorruption and Complex Crimes Unit and a special office under the Attorney General to handle public official corruption cases have been established.

Read More

Global Indices & Quick Facts

El Salvador is ranked from the 1st to the 3rd quintile in global indices measuring economic, political, business, and human development, as shown below. Economic freedom is ranked in the 1st quintile, and has improved over the years, according to the Heritage Foundation, which highlights El Salvador’s “impressive record of structural reforms.” These have come in the form of more open trade policies, privatization of state-owned firms, and tax cuts. Investment and financial freedom also are ranked highly. El Salvador ranks lower in indices measuring corruption, political climate, and human development. Freedom House delivers ratings of 2 and 3 to political rights and civil liberties, respectively (on a scale of 1 to 7 with 1 being the highest rating). This is enough to earn El Salvador an overall rating of “Free” but it remains close to the “Partly Free” category. Relatively high levels of corruption place El Salvador near the bottom of the 2nd quintile of Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index, while a high level of poverty and low education levels push El Salvador to the bottom of the 3rd quintile of the UN’s Human Development Index.

Credit Ratings

BB/Negative Fitch

Ba1/Negative Moody's

BB/Stable Standard & Poor's

Macroeconomic Data

2009 GDP (Current Prices): 22.2 billion USD (IMF)

2009 GDP (Per Capita): 3,806 USD (IMF)

2010 GDP (Growth Forecast): 0.5% (IMF)


2009 Inflation (CPI): 1% (IMF)

2008 Unemployment: 6.3% (CIA)


2008 Foreign Direct Investment

FDI (Inward): 0.8 billion USD (UNCTAD)

FDI (Outward): 0.10 billion USD (UNCTAD)


2007 Official Development Assistance

ODA (Received): 88 million USD (OECD)

ODA (Disbursed): N/A million USD (OECD)

Countryreportbutton